Home > Canadian Politics, Conservatism, Conservatives, Corporate Greed, Politics, Quebec, WTF? > Conservatives : Jobs First, Health… whatever.

Conservatives : Jobs First, Health… whatever.

Only in the Conservative Mindset is it acceptable to save jobs in the Tobacco Industry even if it means amending laws to prevent Big Tobacco to market to youth by adding fruity flavors to their coffin nails.

“Freedom of choice is a fundamental principle in a civilized society. We can think what we want about the act of smoking (personally, I don’t smoke), but it remains legal,” Bernier wrote on his blog.

Of course Conservatives say it’s a question of freedom of choice. But can you really have choice when the options are a danger to your health? This isn’t about democracy. Because if you asked the masses if they still wanted to pay taxes we all know what the answer would be so of course we don’t leave that up to the masses. So if we had left the tobacco laws to the rule of masses we would still be breathing that smoke in offices, hospitals and restaurants. Laws don’t exist because the masses agreed; they exist to keep the masses honest. Without laws we’d all be poo-flinging monkeys up in trees.

But of course, in the name of saving jobs and keep their corporate contributions coming, the Conservatives would most likely set fire to a litter of puppies in front of toddlers. Because it’s the economy stupid. So it comes to no real surprise to read

But Tories from Quebec pushed for changes after Rothmans warned it might have to rethink plans to expand its Quebec City plant – jeopardizing some 330 jobs – if the legislation passed without amendments.

The Quebec Conservative caucus, led by former foreign affairs minister Maxime Bernier, deemed the legislation too broad. (source)

Ok let’s be clear that the Rothmans plant is not about to close, sadly and that the loss of jobs is a loss of projected jobs due to a planned expansion. So the conservatives don’t want to save jobs, they want to expand the tobacco market. Expand the tobacco market? Are you fucking kidding me?

To be a true utilitarian let’s bring it down to simple math.

Smoking contributes to more than 37,000 deaths a year in Canada, of which almost 11,000 are heart disease and stroke-related (29% of all smoking-related deaths are heart disease and stroke-related).

Almost 6,300 non-smokers die each year from exposure to second-hand smoke.

Smoking is responsible for 14.54% of all heart disease and stroke deaths.

If current rates of tobacco use continue, approximately 1 million Canadians will die over the next 20 years as a direct result of smoking and second-hand smoke. (source)

If you had a choice between having even more people smoking and dying a slow-choke death like the already 37000 smoking related deaths over the next year or you could create 330 jobs in a dying industry, which would you chose? If you are intellectually honest you would axe Rothmans in a heartbeat. These jobs can be created in the Green industry which is something the conservatives are amazingly efficient at ignoring.

But then who would ever expect the conservative to learn math? They are too busy writing their agenda while they are still in power. The industry needs to die. It’s a cancer. So Rothmans wants to be bailed out by the government – which goes against the free market ideals of the conservative mindset – well I say let them die.

I can’t even understand, knowing everything that we know about smoking and its consequences how anyone with a moral compass can remain in the employment of these merchants of death anyway. And I don’t accept the Yuppie-Nuremberg defense as an excuse. I think all corporations have skeletons in their closets and yeah people gotta work. But this is to extreme. Might as well become a hitman, it’s the same thing, only in slow motion.

  1. Scotti
    October 5, 2009 at 21:01 | #1

    Hi Dave,

    I stumbled upon your blog awhile ago while I was doing some research on Montreal — such is the wonder of nonspecific search terms on the Internet! I bookmarked it with the intention of returning to read more, which I have done in random bursts. First, I am sorry that you missed out on the best Philly cheesesteaks in the city. They would be located at D’Alessandro’s Steaks, Philadelphia, which is actually in Roxborough. Of course, that may not have helped you because of your work situation and/or lack of transportation, but if you are ever in Philly again, try it out. Pat’s has rested on its laurels for way too long… The second item is a question for you, if you don’t mind? Recently, when I was looking at something Cirque du Soleil, I came across the term, “Director of Creation.” Would you mind explaining for me what exactly a “D of C” actually does? Is it like being a stage manager or like a general manager? Thank you for your response! Scotti

    • October 5, 2009 at 23:48 | #2

      The DCs were I believe folks that manage the new show and artistic creation at the CDS. GMs were called GMs. But I could be wrong. I was not involved in the creative aspect. I was the Infrastructure and Telecom guy and from another firm which runs the CDS’s IT.

  2. October 12, 2009 at 09:38 | #3

    Both of my parents died before age 65 of smoking-related illnesses (lung cancer, heart disease.) I would like to see Rothman’s (and all other purveyors of death-by-nicotine) flushed down the cosmic toilet. And Maxime Bernier is a WANKER.

  3. October 23, 2009 at 14:24 | #4

    “Freedom of choice is a fundamental principle in a civilized society.” I agree with that, particularly when there is little or no specific harm involved in acting on that choice. But the reality is that laws and the gub’ment infringe on our freedom all the time, in the name of the greater good. For example:

    • A 16-year-old doesn’t have the freedom to fill his young gut with beer and wine.

    • I don’t have the freedom to smoke pot or blow snow up my nose.

    • Your 18-year-old brother and his 14-year-old girlfriend don’t have the freedom to express their love carnally.

    • I don’t have freedom from paying taxes.

    • In Quebec, most people don’t have the freedom to decide what school to send their kids to, nor the freedom to give their kids names that are considered “unusual.”

    That said, many (not all) of those freedom blockers are there for a good reason. Drunk driving, speeding, selling heroin, all of those things are illegal because of harm, or potential for harm, to others.

    Well then… how do you explain the law against pot?

    Also, the harm done by smoking is NOT just harm done to the self. It is widely acknowledged (scientifically) that second-hand smoke is far more than a nuisance — it’s a killer, of others. Not only that, it overloads the hospitals with its victims and costs the health care system dearly, which we all pay for.

    Smoking causes many more victims than just the smoker. A few weeks ago I saw an article that claimed (backed up by scientific research) that heart attacks in the UK have decreased very significantly since the ban on smoking in public places (and the resulting reduction of smoking across the board). It was a huge difference.

    Here’s a recent article from “Medical News Today” that say heart attacks have been shown to go down by 17% a year after smoking bans are enacted (based on data from the US and Europe). It’s citing a report from the Journal of the American Heart Association. http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/164747.php

    Here’s a Reuters story citing a report done for the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention that clearly shows that banning smoking indoors lowers the risk of heart attacks for both smokers and (notably) non-smokers. http://www.reuters.com/article/healthNews/idUSTRE59E3WZ20091015

    Last week I went to an “underground” event at an illegal venue, and because it was “unofficial,” people could smoke. There were probably only 30 people there, and I only stayed an hour, but the smoke was so thick it was almost unbearable. I could remember that in my bar-hopping days of the 90s all bars were like that (Else’s my “home base” at the time, was probably the worst). When I got home that night I had to throw my clothes immediately into the wash because they stank so badly.

    Vive le smoking bans! Fuck the tobacco companies!

    • October 23, 2009 at 19:44 | #5

      When I got home that night I had to throw my clothes immediately into the wash because they stank so badly.

      Heh that’s what I did so often, not even funny. So of course I like smoking bans.

  1. No trackbacks yet.