Home > Blogging, Corporate Greed, Internet Culture, Pop Culture, Porn, WTF? > Show Us Your Tits And Be Popular

Show Us Your Tits And Be Popular

When a movie about Chihuahuas in Beverly Hills take the number one spot at the box office for two weeks in a row, I consider that a sign of the apocalypse. But when we go from this:

Vanessa Hudgens Nude

Think this will help my career?

To this:

I guess it will help to show my tits.

I guess it will help to show my tits.

I have to ask; how stupid are we?

Oh and I called it. Read this Click here. Vanessa Hudgens was a nobody, a smalltime mickey-mouse actresse for the Disney channel making straight to DVD movies and was only known to the tween set.  She poses for now infamous nude pictures made for her boyfriend it seems, but to me they seem well posed and launched a mudslide of free publicity thus launching her career as a B-lister starlet who will forever be known as that girl with the neatly trimmed beaver. And that’s what exactly happened.

  • Suddenly miss nobody becomes the spokesperson of Neutrogena.

  • The face of Sears:

If that doesn’t remind you of another skanky mickey-mouser but blonde, I don’t know what will.

  • And she also sells shoes for Ecko

So what’s the lesson for girls here? Just use your tits and pussy to achieve what you want in life, forget education and self-respect. Take your clothes off and show us the goods and everything else will follow through. It worked for Vanessa and it working for Miley Cyrus who’s also younger and going through the same motions to achieve more fame and fortune.

But again I ask how stupid are we? Because do we really believe that this is young stupid teenagers acting out or is this a new business model at work? No one knew who Vanessa Hudgens  was before she flashed her breasts to the internet.  All of a sudden a Direct to DVD series gets theater release and also the Box Office crown. Coincidence? I suspect that Disney, that family entertainment company fully endorses and enable this behavior and capitalizes on it. Won’t be long before Miley Cirus really goes topless to give another boost to her career, because that picture spread taken by photography icon Annie Leibovitz wasn’t topless, it was a bare back but I digress.

What happened to talent? Well it sells but it’s not as easily contained as a dumb but good looking girl who can easily be manipulated. Talented people abound, but people have been convinced that all that matters is good looks. Just look at the pop bands today. Even the punk bands, if we can call them punk bands, are good looking people. Are Miley or Vanessa the next Janis Joplin? Fuck no. They are disposable candy coated tarts who will serve their purpose for a money making machine. Just more pieces of ass to sell DVDs and movie tickets and viewers and nothing more. Once there are no longer young and firm, they will end up as dumpster fodder, just look at how it all worked out so well for Britney once she turned fat trailer park trash.

Why do we buy into it? Don’t we care anymore about talent? Skills? Have women been reduced to being eye candy only? I’m no hypocrite. I love looking at naked women as much as the next guy, but come on. It’s all cool taking the really hot girl home for the fuck-marathon of your life, but eventually you have to talk right? If she’s dumb as a bag of nails, how long can her tits remain interesting? There’s gotta be a yoke in the egg-shell, no matter how perfectly smooth that shell is. There’s gotta be equilibrium somewhere.

And right now the image being shown to girls by these props called role-models are ditz and morons who know nothing and have no interest in knowing anything. What’s important is that perfect hair, the perfect funbags, a neatly trimmed bush and having a perfectly toned ass. Because all that matters is being pretty and getting a guy who has to be equally pretty and stupid. And if you look good, flash your tits once in a while you too can be successful beyond your wildest dreams.

It’s all about the tits. Seriously. Men are really a bunch of dumb fucks also. See that picture on top? I bet you didn’t even see the CNN screen shot. You reading here are part of a very small minority. Most people will come here in hopes of finding naked pictures of Vanessa Hudgens. And they will get get some payoff but these people are the dumb fucks I’m talking about. Again, I’m no hypocrite. I wanted to see what the big hoopla was all about and I went to see, and I saw. And that was it. I blogged about it and posted the pictures to bitch about it and since then, it remains my most visited post with search terms such as “Vanessa hudgens pussy” or Vanessa hudgens hairy beaver” and it’s been over a year. Just to see that one picture of a naked teenager.

The web is jam-packed with porn and y’all want that one picture. Wait till pictures of Scarlett Johansson’s’ ripe naked melons show up on the internet, the whole thing should crash.  But what astounds me is this. You have access to the greastest information network ever created. It’s all free, the information is never checked out like a book at a library and what do you do? You look for pictures of Vanessa Hudgens and a lot of other stuff:

Porn, I need MORE PORN...

And that’s certainly a very minor portion of what I talk about on this blog. This reminds me of something I witnessed at a magazine store in Montreal with a friend of mine. The magazines were basically setup by intellectual strength. It started with rags like US Magazine and other Hollywood news, going through decoration magazines, then nature magazines, then psychology and fine arts. Guess where the talking monkey mob was? And then I wonder why my magazines cost over 20$ a pop, because not enough people buy them. Because people don’t care about smart stuff anymore. They want to know who Paris Hilton is fucking. Because that is so much more important than what’s going on in the world.

It’s a self feeding system. Guys with their dicks in their hands are dying to see starlets naked and girls dying to get ahead will show their tits to achieve fame and recognition.  And then these same guys expect the same from everyday girls. And these girls see this behavior and mimic it also willingly to be accepted in the group. The system is called the lowest common denominator.

We’ve been successfully dumbed down and distracted from what really matters and the great Edward R Murrow said on the 15th of October, 50 years ago; “Our history will be what we make it. And if there are any historians about fifty or a hundred years from now, and there should be preserved the kinescopes for one week of all three networks, they will there find recorded in black and white, or color, evidence of decadence, escapism and insulation from the realities of the world in which we live.”

  1. October 27, 2008 at 23:06 | #1

    Redonkuless. It’s amazing what a set of naked photo’s can do for nobodies in Hollywood. Can’t believe parents let their kids go see a movie involving this no talent ass clown, after having her pics smeared all over the net. No protests, no bans, no letters sent to Disney. What a joke.

  2. October 27, 2008 at 23:59 | #2

    Hit the nail right on the head… reminds me of Fukuyama’s great disruption, where amongst other themes he brings this up:

    “One of the greatest frauds perpetrated during the Great Disruption was the notion that the sexual revolution was gender-neutral, benefiting women and men equally, and that it somehow had a kinship with the feminist revolution. In fact the sexual revolution served the interests of men, and in the end put sharp limits on the gains that women might otherwise have expected from their liberation from traditional roles.”

    pinpointing the fall around the early 60’s, I think where we’re at makes perfect (although totally sickening) sense. the dumbing down and all.

    overall, a great read. as is your post. thank you.

  3. October 28, 2008 at 09:26 | #3

    Amen my dear friend!

    You’re right all the way, and even I, as a woman, I could never go down that road to obtain something.

    Maybe I should have thou, I would have had more out of life, I’m sure…

    Pathetic……

  4. October 29, 2008 at 14:59 | #4

    I’ve shown my nipples so many freakin’ times on my blog – where is my fame? Where is my sponsorship?

  5. October 31, 2008 at 19:45 | #5

    Je pensais à cela aujourd’hui Justement. La question de savoir si la femme a évoluer ou que son statut social a avancé. Et bien non! La femme était beaucoup plus considéré en 1750, il y avait des femmes de pouvoir comme CatherineII La Grande et bien d’autres. Nommez-moi un pays qui est dirigé par une femme aujourd’hui, il n’y en n’a pas. Indira Gandi s’est fait tuer pour une seule raison; parce qu’elle était femme, donc chose inacceptable pour certains. Je pourrais dicourir longtemps sur le sujet mais peut-être en ai-je pas l’audace maintenant. Mon cheval arabe m’attends!

  6. November 1, 2008 at 00:12 | #6

    @Loyglo Angela Merkel de l’Allemagne. Mais en effet ce n’Est pas prometteur pour le statut de la femme.

  7. ehead
    November 17, 2008 at 11:10 | #7

    Evolution has hard wired us to get a little dopamine rush out of that simple picture. It’s like having a little morphine dispenser in our heads and all we have to do is look at a picture to get it to release a few drops.

    You may think it’s lame for people to pursue such easy pleasures, and that’s certainly your right. I have mixed feelings on the subject… I’m not elitist enough to presume my own personal tastes and values should be universalized, and I’m existentialist enough to embrace the idea that “no one thing is better than any other thing”, that it’s ultimately up to the individual, and that whatever any of us decides upon is ultimately as absurd as what the next guy decides upon.

    Certainly the search engine statistics don’t lie though… we humans value “tits”. So be it.

  1. No trackbacks yet.