The Megan Meier Suicide controversy has raised enough dust on the web to merit it’s own Wikipedia mention. This is not a problem, it’s Wikipedia, it’s what we geeks expect. What better place to keep informed and appraised. I did find the “Reaction to news story” section interesting though. The bloggers and the neighbors really went on witch-hunt mode.
Megan’s story was first reported in the St. Louis Suburban Journal. When the story first appeared, reader comments focused on Lori and Curt Drew who had posed as Josh. Later, the focus was on the St. Louis Suburban Journal’s decision not to print the name of the Drew’s who were responsible for the hoax. The reporter stated in an interview that the names were withheld out of concern for the minor child of the hoaxer. Within days, the identity of the perpetrator, Lori Drew, was revealed by angry bloggers. The Drew’s were targeted with vandalism, prank phone calls, paintball attacks and a “prank” call to the local police which led to “as many as 15 deputies [drawing] weapons and [charging] the home of Lori and Curt Drew,” the people identified as the hoaxers. Due to the vehement public reaction, police added additional patrols to the neighbourhood, and the Drew’s have installed a security camera.
Sadly I’m kind of all for this. What the Drew’s have done is so beyond heinous and disgusting I can’t begin to express the vile vicious and violent things I’d love to do to them for having mentally tortured this child till she hung herself. I know what depression is. I know what being a ghost in high-school is. I hope they have a lot of security because a lot of people seem out to get them.
That story is so sad…… I don’t know what to say really…
Sad, sick, depraved. My inner savage wants to hang them in the public square. But that wont solve squat. I’m just so disgusted.
At least they’re internet savvy which means that they may see the Wikipedia entry and the thousands of blogs around the world that talk about just how evil they are.
On Wednesday, October 21st, city officials enacted an ordinance designed to address the public outcry for justice in the Megan Meier tragedy. The six member Board of Aldermen made Internet harassment a misdemeanor, punishable by up to a $500 fine and 90 days in jail.
Does this new law provide any justice for Megan? Does this law provide equitable relief for a future victim or actually weaken the current law?
I reject the premise of this new law and believe it completely misses the mark. The reasoning behind this opinion is that city officials have consistently treated this case as an Internet harassment case instead of a child welfare/exploitation case.
Classifying this case a harassment issue completely fails to address the most serious aspects of the methods Lori Drew employed to lead this youth to her demise. The Vice disagrees that harassment was even a factor in this case until just a couple of days before Megan’s death.
Considering this case a harassment issue is incorrect because during the 5 weeks Lori Drew baited and groomed her victim, the attention was NOT unwanted attention. It was not harassment at all. It was invited attention. Megan participated in the conversations willingly because she was lured, manipulated and exploited without her knowledge.
This law willfully sets a precedent that future child exploiters and predators can use to reclassify their cases to harassment issues. In effect, the law enacted to give Megan justice, may make her even more vulnerable. So long as the child victim doesn’t tell the predator to stop, even a harassment charge may not stick with the right circumstances and a good defender.
Every aspect of this case follows the same procedural requirement used to convict a Child Predator. A child was manipulated by an adult. A child was engaged in sexually explicit conversation (as acknowledged by Lori Drew herself). An adult imposed her will on a child by misleading her, using a profile designed to sexually or intimately attract the 13 year old Megan.
Lori then utilized the power she had gained over this child to cause significant distress and endangerment to that child. She even stipulated to many of these activities in the police report she filed shortly after Megan’s death.
We can go on and on here, but the parallels between this case and many other child predator cases that are successfully prosecuted bear striking similarities.
Child Predator laws do not require much more than simply proving that an adult has engaged a minor in sexually explicit conversation. Lori Drew has already stipulated that her conversations with Megan were sometimes sexual for a child Megan’s age.
City officials who continue to ignore this viable, documented admission and continue to address this issue as harassment are intentionally burying their heads in the sand, when the solution is staring them right in the face. Why?
On June 5th, 2006, Governor Matt Blunt signed into law stiff penalties for convicted sex offenders. The Vice believes that officials continually reject a child predator classification of this case in order to keep the penalty of this offense out of this harsher realm.
Opponents of this law are active in defeating this law not by changing it, but by disqualifying cases like Megan’s from ever being heard.
There are several other child exploitation laws on the books. To date, none of them have even been considered by City, State and Federal officials in this case. I’m outraged that a motion was never even filed, so that the case could at least be argued before a judge or jury.
Those satisfied with this response out of Missouri officials need to think through the effect this law will truly have. It quite honestly has the potential to directly undermine Jessica’s law. It quiet easily gives prosecutors a way out of prosecuting child endangerment and child predator cases in the future.
Beware the wolf in sheep’s clothing here.
Danny Vice
http://weeklyvice.blogspot.com
Lori Drew is a psychopath. That part is clear.
But more disturbing than that are the actions of authorities: If it had been an adult MALE that “carried on” in a sexually explicit way with a 13 year old girl, even if it WERE for the purposes of revenge for his teen daughter, he’d be locked up as a pedophile.
Second, there are al-READY laws on the books that cover this type of harassment. For chrissake: just implement them!
What is particularly chilling to me, is that Lori Drew knew that the victim was known to be suicidal in the past. That means that her statement to her that the “world would be better off without you” or whatever it was… is even MORE chilling: it means she was TRYING to steer this girl to suicide. It means she had a desire to push it in that direction, and did so.
Reminds me of Charles Manson. He never “technically” put his own hands upon his victims either, but he “made it happen” by manipulating people, I mean that’s the premise upon which he was convicted: that he had INCITED it.
Same thing here. Lori Drew incited this suicide and should be just as responsible as Manson was when he incited those murders—and she should also be treated just like any other adult who engages in online relationships of a sexual nature with under-aged children.
I can understand why Lori is getting the flack she apparently deserves — it was her prank. But I am concerned that her husband is being subjected to ridicule and this witch-hunt by the community when he appears to have done nothing wrong and was not involved in this. For all we know he may not have had any knowledge of his wife’s actions.
Hypatia, Definitely, if she had been a man all the To-Catch-A-Predator loonies would be all over this asking for Drew’s head on a plate.
There is a video and a small story about the candlelight vigil for Megan at sccworlds.com. Nice video set to from the vigil. Go check it out.
Lori Drew must be seriously regretting going to the cops and filing a police report against Megan’s parents. If it hadn’t have been for that the soulless monster probably would have gotten away with what her sick prank againt Megan.
I hope the bitch suffers for the rest of her pathetic and worthless life for destroying the Meiers lives.
Sick!!! She was a 13 year old girl. I know too many 13 year olds, both male and female, that have psychological problems. One thing is sure as hell, none of them deserve to die for their problems.
We should go to all ends to make sure Lori Drew pays. Ostracize her, publicly humiliate her…do what it takes to make her pay!
[...] Lori Drew now Notorious with Wikipedia Page [...]
Lori Drew is an overweight, undersexed, bitter, evil bitch. She is the worst kind of person. She probably calls herself a Christian. I’ve seen her kind too many times.
The questions surrounding the Megan Meier Suicide/Internet harassment story are numerous. What should happen to the Drews? What will the prosecutors do? Will the Drews actually continue with their law suite against the Meier family?
The most debated question however is not whether or not some sort of punishment should be metered out. The pressing question is whether or not the adult who is responsible for this deadly hoax should have been reveal to the public.
The original story, published close to a year ago concealed the name of the adult bully behind the fake MySpace account that convinced Megan to take her own life. Even now, I have yet to find a major news outlet that’s been willing to reveal Ms. Drew’s identity to the public at large. It was the Blogging community that decided to unmask this modern day villain. Here’s why I think they were right to do so.
My Sharp Opinion
As details about Lori Drew’s 6 week cyber-voyeur techniques emerged, the more I am convinced that outing this kind of behavior is not only right, but essential. Essential? Why?
It is becoming clearer and clearer that Lori Drew employed many of the same grooming techniques that child predators utilize to charm their way into gaining a child’s trust. Even Lori herself reported to police that she created the MySpace account in order to find out what Megan was saying.
The most significant key here is that Lori Drew spent approximately 6 full weeks baiting Megan into this trust by posing as a “cute” boy that Megan would be attracted to. Right there, Drew utilizes the sexual stimulation that exists in male/female pair bonding in order to manipulate the 13 year old girl.
Outing Child Predators has been public policy in most states and is usually upheld under the premise that the public has a right to reasonably protect itself from criminal behavior where it exists. Families with children have a right to know when those who might prey upon their child, live nearby. Public policy dictates that if a child is exposed to potential harm from predatory activity, then parents should at least have the opportunity to be aware such harm may exist.
It is the predatory nature of this case that bears striking resemblance to the public policy. The only difference in this case is that the alleged perpetrator of this heinous act has not been charged or convicted.
Thus far, details in the case have been heavily supported by Lori Drew’s own admissions, police records and interviews. The amount of speculation in this case has been minimal, and the majority of public outrage has largely focused on the facts presented.
The Missouri Public Records Act of 1961 were devised partially to inform the public of persons, events, proceedings and reports that may effect the public directly. These records (such as the charges Lori Drew filed against the Meier family), were the principal documents used to tie Lori Drew to her abhorrent acts. By filing this police report, Lori in effect put herself into the spot light. The Blogging community simply connected the dots and reported the results.
This is prue bull hockey. The meir family should receive justice. She is a child predator… Lori Drew and should be on a register offenders list. Isnt harassing the mentally ill against the law? Does Meagan have civil rights? If a child causes harm to an animal which is under the control also an adult then the only one held accountable under a court of law is the adult. Lori drew should be held liable for allowing minors to also torment Meier
Wonder if the family who perpetrated this fake myspace joke in which an innocent young lady killed herself have expressed any remorse, any sorry, any compassion for this girl and her family. The guilty family Lori Drew & Co. are truly sick. If there was a problem they should have gone over to the other family’s home and discussed this. See what’s happened now? If Lori Drew has a conscience she will not sleep for the rest of her life. May GOD have mercy on us all.
I know precisely how it feels to lose a sister. My little sister , Mary, is dead from breast cancer. It’s not a very happy feeling.
Agreed, this Lori Drew woman IS a child predator. The law may not have been there to catch here, which is unfortunate, but she is a child predator.
Her image and reputation has been tarnished, hopefully permanently.
I can’t imagine the Drew’s don’t feel sorrow for what they did. Even I do and I wasn’t involved. No one could possibly want this to happen. I’m not defending what they did and I don’t personally know them. Who can possibly understand what fragile state of mind this young girl was in when she took her own life. Even her own parents apparently didn’t. But, I haven’t seen this much outrage over the young man who killed himself listening to a Blink 182 song over and over again.
I read the article, but yet there are so many unanswered questions. All I know is what was in the paper. It painted her as a sad, mentally unstable, insecure young girl. She looked like a happy, pretty, young girl. A girl who had been involved in an online hoax herself years earlier, posing as a more attractive young girl in order to meet online other young boys/men. So, that should have been a red flag to her parents that she was emotionally unable to deal responsibly online. But - they let her back on. I can’t imagine what they were thinking. But mental disability or not, she was just as vulnerable as any other young girl. Are we to know the mental state of every individual we talk to or to understand what one final thing will send them over the edge? Her parents were downstairs cooking dinner for God’s sake, and the mother at least was already aware she was having problems that very day.
I was not aware, nor was it discussed in the paper, whether there were sexually related discussions between the minor and the adult. It is true that sexual predators pose as someone else all the time. We can’t even stop all of them.
My daughter has also been the victem of myspace bullying from school and neighbor kids. They were much more open about it and did not hide their identity. It went on for several weeks. From the article, it stated that Lori Drew wanted to know what Megan Meier was saying about her daughter after a fight and the end of a friendship. I can understand that. I do not allow my children to have access on MySpace or similar sites. My daughter found out from school mates. She relied on her “real” friends to print the vulgar comments and we then took them to the offending child’s parents. That didn’t stop it either. I consoled her with the knowledge that this is wrong. She did not deserver it and her real friends would stand by her. That’s what happened in the end and it eventually blew over.
To say that this could all have been resolved had the families discussed it is simplifying it too much. You’re are basing this on the assumption that both families can reasonably discuss what their kids do wrong without getting defensive or worse. Ask any teacher, this is not always true.
I just can’t imagine how Megan’s parents feel. I would feel so guilty, knowing I let her online in the first place, and then knowing that under my watch she died. MySpace’s rule is that kids have to be 13. I’ve been online and reported age abuse. I wonder if she posted her real age. From what I’ve seen, there so much vulgar language, bullying, and sex talk online, I can’t imagine anyone letting a minor child submit themselves to this. I also can’t imagine that it was only one person doing it. When it happened to my daughter, there were several kids joining in.
My attitude is that minors do not belong online. My kids have enough to keep up with just in homework and the friends they already have, they don’t have time and are not emotionally mature enough to handle virtual firends. They have cell phones, email (which I can monitor), and real activities with real people.
It’s just a sad heartbreaking story. But, I don’t just see two guilty parents here. I see four. Sorry, that’s my two cents.
WARRENING:!!!this may be stronge words said here ..
but i truly hate this cunt!!
I DONT HAVE A SHIT LIST .. BUT NOW I HAVE A HATE LIST .. AND THIS Lori Drew IS A vileness !!! that poor Megan Meier.. she was inncent and lovely
i hope you read this Lori drew!!!
I HATE YOU LORI DREW YOU FAT FUUCKK!!! YOU LOOK LIKE AN OLD FAT ASS COW OF A MAN 47 YEAR OLD WHAT TIM EYOU HAVE TALKING TO TEENAGER?? YOU ARE SICK FUUCKK!!
YOU ARE EVIL.. YOU KNOW WHAT THAT MEANS .. IT MEANS THAT WHEN YOU SOMETHING WROND AND YOU SHOULD KNOW IT IS WRONG YOU SO IT ANYWAYS.. THAT MAKE YOU AN EVIL ASSSHOLE!!!!
YOU MIGHT THINKING ABOUT MOVING TO THE SOUTH POLE .. YOU HAVE A COLD HEART .. WAIT YOU DONT HAVE A HEART!! YOU EVEIL BITCH .. WHY DONT YOU JUMP IN A LAKE … I HOPE YOU ARE HUANTED 4 FEVER REST YOU RLIFE .. WE MAY NOT SEE IT .. WHAT YOU DID .. IS EVEIL WHAT COMES AROUND GOES AROUND .. AND IN THE END SOMWEAR YOU GET YOURS…MAYBE YOU HIT BY LIGHTING… YOU ARE JUST GROSS!!! YOU FAT UGLY OLD HAG!!
GO TO HELL!!!
Lori Janine Drew THAT WICTHES FULL NAME!!
ok , i had blew my top .. that fact this(lori WITCH ).. didnt say try have compassion and saying sorry .. and instead ,.. the (WITCH loRI)asked Megan Meier’s Mother .. if she COULD TELL THEM TO STOP of them stop saying anything more about her name and weare she lives and have the ” people” meaning us to stop herassing her..
well that is the most selfish narrssius thing to asked Megan Meier’s mother .. knowing that (WITCH lori)she killed Megan…!!!
what a selfish cold old hag of a evil cunnt!!!
Horrible. How is this not a case of a child predator? Someone who goes after a minor and uses manipulation and lies to cause harm emotionally or otherwise to a child. This is so sick and to think they ahve somehow even managed to excuse themselves from blame in all this is unbelievable. There is a Karma earned in this and every action has a reaction. The public is going after them now and they have brought out the anger of good people as well as some of the more fringe elements. I wish them luck and pray for them physically as well as for their souls.
im sorry but those involved with her death should be prosecuted, charged with murder, and give the death penalty. they deserve nothing less.
Reportedly, the Meiers were storing a pool table in their basement for the Drew family. After Megans tradgedy and in their anger, the Meiers destroyed it. I hear the Drew family is sueing the Meiers for the cost of the table. How sick is that? The Drew’s are lucky they havent had their faces smashed in or a bullet through their brains. I hope that woman burns in HELL!
What a sad excuse for a human being…to pick on a child…karma will get her!!!!!
FYI 12/4/2007
http://www.stltoday.com/stltoday/news/stories.nsf/laworder/story/58703BE04D620959862573A7004C5AF3?OpenDocument
“Briscoe said this morning that Lori Drew has had to close her advertising business and her daughter has dropped out of school in the wake of the publicity and criminal investigation of the cyberspace bullying. Briscoe also said it was not clear if the Drews would be able to continue living in their Dardenne Prairie neighborhood, four doors down from the Meier house.”
“[Drew's accomplice, Ashley] Grills, Banas said, was later hospitalized for psychiatric care as a result of the case. She threatened to harm herself, he said.”
[...] Lori Drew now Notorious with Wikipedia Page [...]
If there are any middle school students or high school students reading this, please know that NOBODY cares who you were in high school. If you feel ridiculed or bullied, be strong!!! You will overcome it. And the world is full of people who will appreciate YOU for YOU. Adults won’t care if you were cool or popular or a geek, or whatever. Be TRUE TO YOURSELF and don’t let anyone make you believe you are worthless. Because you MATTER. And if someone doesn’t like you, it’s THEIR problem. NOT YOURS. I was teased in high school. A total nerd. I married a “POPULAR” gorgeous man!! Because like I said, after high school, it just doesn’t matter…Someone will love YOU FOR YOU!!!!!!!!! Don’t change. Be YOU.
[...] to Megan’s Suicide, maybe prosecuted under any number of Child Predator Laws as suggested here: Lori Drew now Notorious with Wikipedia Page « Darkly Dreaming David it would seem “Karma” and payback are a ##### as the Drew’s have been ostracized by their [...]
Whoa! It looks like the Drews and their nosy accomplace will and are going to get their just desserts. There’s no way they can continue to live in that neighborhood with all that is going on. The sheer pressure of the community will drive the scum-sucking ass-holes out of there. Look out, Dallas/Ft. Worth! I think I sense some new residents that are about to arrive. They’ll fit right in!
Danny Vice, no one could have written anything better than what you wrote. I just returned from Iraq and spent 12 months helping to begin and preserve what little freedoms and social injustices occur in a country that seems so far entrenched in destroying each other, I wonder if it will ever come out of the hole that was created. One would think that in America we would be more grateful, but unfortunately people like Lori Drew live everywhere. IMO, she is the purest form of arrogance and evil. To be so manipulative and arrogant it is completely unknown to my personality. I cannot comprehend it. And Lori Drew continues to relieve herself of accountability, but should we expect anything more? It will take a life time of self-awareness and therapy for her to face herself and admit what she did. This was not only a crime, but immoral. She may get away with it on Earth, but not with God. No one can fool the Big Guy.
Yeah…make it all right by giving the woman a dose of her own medicine. Even though it hasn’t been proven that she had anything to do with it.
That’s really mature. No, really.
It’s disgusting.
As a law student, I would simply like to communicate that the D.A., in my opinion, is LAZY. There are some cases out there where people have been taken advantage of, taken their own lives, and the person or persons whose behavior was the proximal cause of the event have been successfully prosecuted. BUT FOR the conduct and intentional actions of Lori Drew, Megan would not have committed suicide. Now folks, follow along with me please, because I’m going to do some of the DA’s work for him. Pay close attention - this gets complex.
Issue: Did Lori Drew commit a homocide?
HOMOCIDE: A homicide is the killing of one human being by another human being.
Drew’s actions on the web were voluntary and resulted in the death of Megan. BUT FOR these actions, Megan would still be alive.
The court will find that a homocide was committed.
This leads to ——-
MURDER: A murder is the killing of one human being by another human being with malice aforethought.
Lori Drew blatantly admitted that she created the “Josh” alter-ego to play with Megan’s mind. Clearly, this is indicitive of malice and the mischeivious mind. Furthermore, Drew, being a neighbor, was obviously aware of Megan’s mental state - it is certainly clear that the other neighbors were. Drew, by creating the alter-ego and using the e-mail VOLUNTARILY engaged in a life-endangering activity. As she knew of Megan’s mental state - the results of her activities were FORSEEABLE. The possible harm was FORSEEABLE. In other words, Lori Drew made a concious choice knowing the potential consequences. Malice aforethough is clear in this case as she was in a man-endangering state of mind.
A jury would more than likely convict Drew of murder.
Did Lori Drew commit first degree murder?
FIRST DEGREE MURDER: Murder in the first degree is murder committed while lying in wait, by poison, torture, deliberately and with premeditation, or murder that results from a death occurring during the commission of a dangerous felony; in other words, through application of the felony murder rule.
Lori volunatarily engaged in this conduct. She admitted to planning it, and this to premediation, which means to carefully consider. She layed in wait for this child on the cyberwaves. She engaged in a molestation of the child through the use of the child’s compromised state of mind.
Chances are the court would convict her of first degree murder.
Is a conviction of second degree murder possible if the jury can’t convict on first degree murder?
MURDER IN THE SECOND DEGREE is all other homocides committed with malice aforethought but not meeting the requirements for murder in the first degree.
Again -BUT FOR the conduct…..plus we have the intended results doctrine which states that if the act or crime results in a harm it is assumed that the culprit intended for the results to happen and thus should be charged accordingly.
2nd Degree Murder is a possibility.
Okay - what if that fails? Hmmmm. Well, let’s go into manslaughter. You have voluntary and involuntary. The basic difference is that involuntary is a homocide the result of someone’s unconscionable negligence - gee whiz, you could at least get Drew for that. Voluntary is a death resulting from a voluntary act but without malice aforethought - or from being provoked. Without wasting a lot of time, I could go on.
From a civil point of view - suing Drew is a piece of cake. Use the doctrin of Res Ipsa Loquitor. (The case speaks for itself).
Questions?
The comment by James R. Holmes doesn’t consider the problem of “Remoteness”. The perpetrator didn’t tell the victim to kill herself and despite being depicted as callous in reacting to the tragedy, might never have imagined that her actions could result in the victim’s suicide. This is a very difficult case and the prosecutor should provide the public with a detailed explanation why charges can or can’t be laid.
There’s a difference if the perpetrator had been a fellow teen vs. an adult, but it’s tough to say how that difference should affect culpability. We are upset that an adult behaved in a manner that we view as childish, but does that mean that we feel the perpetrator should be charged with murder? The issue of foreseeability is a problem, because an adult would not imagine that teasing would lead to suicide. An emotional teen is more easily distraught, but is this something that the perpetrator really understood?
The biggest obstacle I see to a murder charge is connecting the perpetrator’s actions with the suicide. Causality would require the prosecutor to prove that the perpetrator was exerting control over the victim. For example, hypnosis or brainwashing are examples where you can argue for the existence of control. Here this would be tough to prove.
Even a civil case would be an uphill battle. What kind of duty did the perpetrator owe the victim? This is an unpleasant question, because it raises the possibility that the perpetrator might be legally protected in her right to tease the victim and hurt her feelings.
A successful criminal or civil case could be based on a theory that the perpetrator knew that the victim was sensitive and easily influenced, and was under the complete control of the perpetrator. The perpetrator would need to be shown to have commanded the victim to commit suicide. A civil action might require establishing a duty of care towards the victim. What would this be based on? What would be the wrong? Intentional inflection of mental distress?
Perhaps a murder charge could be formulated if another underlying felony was found (internet harassment, stalking a minor etc.)
In response to COCO
You are so right! My brother took his life due to the breakdown of his self esteem from so many years of ridicule. He had red hair. He was teased and tormented. The first time my brother saw my son at age two and who is now 13, he looked at him with disgust and said, “oh god, he has red hair”. That was the only time he saw him.
Your message is so powerful and completely right. Nothing that happens at those tender ages will matter even a few short years later but they can have such an impact.
It is a struggle I face daily as a parent to try to teach my children that the words they hear today from their so-called friends /peers shouldn’t reflect on who they are as a person today and who they will become.
Very tragic! To the Meirer Family- My heart breaks for you. I can’t imagine your pain. My heart breaks for Megan!
Lori, I hope you and your kid will suffer forever in this life or after. I hope someday you’ll read this post that I curse you and your familt to hell. What are you going to do to pay for what you have done?
Jill are you actually blaming Megan for all of this? And her parents!? It isn’t possible to monitor children 24/7. And if Megan put up a pic of a woman she thought was more attractive in order to try to meet friends online, because she had NO confidence in her own appearance - that is not a crime. That did not hurt anybody!
But the people who went after Megan targeted that same insecurity in order to try and destroy her emotionally. They succeeded. No comparison!
I don’t know why you’d insult a dead girl either - but if she was ’sad and mentally unstable’ that is even more reason NOT to torment her. The Drews knew Megan and her family, they had to have known she was vulnerable. They did this anyway. At least the one teen employee must feel remorse or they would not be getting psychiatric help. Lori’s main concern at every turn she’s spoken out, has been for HERSELF.
I think that they should be ignored, and their businesses driven to hell,
but please do not do anything rash.
The father is already being subjected to prosecution over the vandalized
foosball table. If anything bad happens to the Drews, police and prosecutors may blame the father. For that reason, would-be vigilantes
need to cool their jets.
This is in response to comment number 12 by subfighter, who wrote:
“Lori Drew is an overweight, undersexed, bitter, evil bitch. She is the worst kind of person. She probably calls herself a Christian. I’ve seen her kind too many times.”
WHO ARE YOU TO CONDEMN CHRISTIANS FOR THE ACT OF THIS ONE SICK WOMAN WHO YOU DO NOT EVEN KNOW FOR SURE IS CHRISTIAN? WHY BRING RELIGION INTO THIS??? WHO ARE YOU TO MAKE A GENERALIZATION ABOUT CHRISTIANS?
Lori Drew is a child predator and is a murderer. With the type of evil she is capable of, the only place she should be is behind bars. I pray that she will be removed from society - this is the scariest type of person there is. Her kids should be protected from her - she is dangerous on a whole new level.
While what this lady did is disgusting and an outrage ,,,the site was condoned and supervised by her parents ….it is sad ..but jail? she is a sick bleep! we can not judge less we be judged ….how many times has someone said i hate you or told a secret or lied to get what they want…unfortunately she must wait for judgement by the only one who can…..and it is not any of us….this civil lawsuit blame everyone else society we have now sucks. the mother’s last words to her daughter were not chosen well …almost an i told you so….back off …ms. drew is a bad person but the truth is that should get you jail time?
There’s what I’d like to do to them, and then there’s what I think we should do with them.
I think we should deport them and never allow them to return to this country. Not ever. It seems to me their mentality would be more at home in Iran or Syria anyway. If not them then who?
We don’t need trash like this in our nation under God. If they’re smart, they’ll do it of their own accord. I don’t see what kind of a life they could possibly provide for their young child in the USA now that they are a national pariah.
Just one mans opinion.