Home > Book List 2007, Book Review, Books, Reading > Dead Trees: A Book List for 2007 (Update XIII)

Dead Trees: A Book List for 2007 (Update XIII)

old_books.jpgAfter reading Blork’s book list for 2006 I decided to keep one for 2007. I’ll update this post every time I finish reading a book and republish it. I doubt I’ll get as many books as he does, read in one year but I do consume books one after the other non-stop and read on all sorts of topics, mostly non-fiction. You can always keep abreast of what I am currently reading by looking at my sidebar, there’s an entire section dedicated to my reading and the Now Reading part even has the covers of the books.

The man who does not read good books has no advantage over the man who can’t read them.
- Mark Twain

 

Update XIII : Published November 19th, 2007

The End of America: Letter of Warning To A Young Patriot
by Naomi Wolf

Could it happen? Could America descend into a fascist state? All the right-wing patriotic pornography we’ve seen of late seems to indicate it could. Naomi Wolf takes a good look at the parallels between previous fascist states and tendencies emerging right now in America. Even the stubborn most dogmatic conservative should read this book, take him or herself out of the American Experience bubble for the time to read this book and look inside and analyze everything that’s going on and realize that something not right is going on and that something needs to be done before its too late. Sadly I now know more about the Constitution than I do about The Charter. Sadly I’m afraid for my American neighbors.

4-out-of-5-stars.gif

Update XII : Published November 13th, 2007

The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism
by Naomi Klein

I always had a sneaking suspicion about backroom deals and power struggles by US corporations to control the world market but I only had only a few puzzle pieces to go. Now the puzzle is complete. Now I see the big picture. Somewhere, deep down I wish I didn’t. But there it is the Friedman doctrine to rid the world of labour forces, to privatize everything and deregulate everything, to make the rich, richer and the poor, destitute. It takes only Cordelia’s wit to ask, what Friedman’s childhood trauma was and it is simple, his daddy’s business was shutdown by unions and his whole philosophy is based on its antipode. By chapter one you’ll be soiling your underwear and by the end of the book, you will have pretty much given up, but there is hope, shock wears off, people wake up and educate yourself; INFORMATION IS SHOCK RESISTANCE… ARM YOURSELF

5-out-of-5-stars.gif

 

Update XI : Published September 22th, 2007


Twinkie, Deconstructed: My Journey to Discover How the Ingredients Found in Processed Foods Are Grown, Mined (Yes, Mined), and Manipulated Into What America Eats
by Steve Ettlinger

With a title like Twinkies, Deconstructed, I knew I wanted to read it. I felt it was going to be an attack on the food industry, sort of like a Supersize Me take on Little Debbie instead on Ronald McDonald. Well turns out it’s en extended ingredient list and the author mostly defends the industry practices and seems to me to be a proponent of free market philosophy which, if you read this blog, you know makes me puke and the book bored me enough I couldn’t finish it.

Update X : Published August 17th, 2007

God Is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything
by Christopher Hitchens

Brutal, vicious, unforgiving and megalomaniacal. Such is how God is perceived, not Christopher Hitchens. Hitchens just kicks ass and takes no prisoners. He drills it into you from the first chapter; religion Poisons Everything. Dawkins is eloquent and unrestrained. Onfray is analytical and direct.

Hitchens goes for the jugular of religion and wants nothing more than to kill it even though he knows well it can’t be done. He shows it no mercy. Before I had some tolerance for religion, now I have none. This and Dawkins’ book had a conversion effect; I can no longer excuse the madness of religion.

5-out-of-5-stars.gif

Taking the Red Pill: Science, Philosophy and Religion in The Matrix
by Glenn Yeffeth

That pretty much caped my reading material on The Matrix for a while (though I think I’ve said this before) and on philosophy. Reading philosophers justify freemarket libertarianism was enough to make me puke and then nit-picking every little scientific detail within The Matrix’s universe was giving me Trekkie flashbacks.

Don’t get me wrong, if you love The Matrix and Philosophy (heh not a lot of folks like that out there) this book is a decent one but aimed at the laidback arm-chair philosopher. I’ve read much deeper material on the philosophical aspects of The Matrix

3-out-of-5-stars.gif

It’s Not News, It’s Fark: How Mass Media Tries to Pass Off Crap As News
by Drew Curtis

The level of cynicism and sarcasm in this book makes me feel like an optimist. And that’s scary shit! Drew Curtis completely tears Mass Media to shreds and leaves no one standing with an argument for the crap the dole out on a daily and he certainly doesn’t shy away from pointing the finger also at the IQ level of those who consume the mass media’s regurgitated crap.

My favourite line from the book: “There were only two groups of people happy about 9/11 (other than the perpetrators). One was the sharks. The other was Gary Condit. Remember him? Probably Not

I almost died laughing in the subway. I thought I was the only who was wondering whatever happened to that alleged internacidal congressman. The book has some redundant parts and some slow parts but then it kicks back in gear and kicks some Media ass.

4-out-of-5-stars.gif

Update IX : Published June 23rd, 2007

indefenseofatheism.jpgIn Defense Of Atheism: The Case Against Christianity, Judaism and Islam
by Michel Onfray

After The God Delusion, vehemently attacking the fairy-dusted brainwashed religious with evolution based arguments comes In Defense Of Atheism by Michel Onfray who vehemently attacks the fairy-dusted brainwashed religious with the oldest of religion’s enemy, philosophy a.k.a. reason. The book starts out pretty soft. Soft enough that I thought to myself this might be all too forgiving. But it ends in a harsh, brutal and unforgiving litany of disputation of the evil of religion. Though lacking the poetic inclination of Richard Dawkins, the purely philosophical approach was all too interesting.

4-out-of-5-stars.gif

 

Update VIII : Published June 7th, 2007

canon-xti.jpgMagic Lantern Guides: Canon EOS Digital Rebel XTi EOS 400D (Magic Lantern Guides)
by Michael Guncheon

Not much to say here. I was expecting a more exhaustive and paufinéd approach but it was more or less the guide I got with my Canon EOS Digital Rebel XTi EOS 400D but just BIGGER and slightly more detailed. I was looking for a more technical approach to photography and less a technical manual flaunting the perfection that is the Canon EOS Digital Rebel XTi EOS 400D.

2-out-of-5-stars.gif

 

 

Update VII : Published May 25th, 2007

how_a_scientist_changed_the_way_we_think_125.jpgRichard Dawkins : How a scientist changed the way we think
by Alan Grafen

A huge love fest for Dawkins and his books, that focuses mostly on his controversial masterpiece and first book, The Selfish Gene. Even those who disagree with him can’t help but love the guy. Brilliant biologist, brilliant writer, brilliant humanist. A quote from the book: “He is a coiner of memorable phrases, he is a ferocious and implacable opponent of those who water the dark roots of superstition. But mainly he celebrates.

4-out-of-5-stars.gif

 

Update VI : Published April 24th, 2007

zen_sayings.jpgSayings and Tales of Zen Buddhism: Reflections for Every Day
by William Wray

A nice collection of reflections, one for everyday, of Zen sayings and wisdom. Some are witty quickly understood one-liners others need more thought to grasp; some seem to approach being a koan. Some deep stuff in here but some sayings seem to be repeated. This may have been best served as a desk calendar one finds in books stores during Christmas time.

3-out-of-5-stars.gif

 

Update V : Published March 28th, 2007

tao_of_photo.jpgThe Tao of Photography: Seeing Beyond Seeing
by Philippe L. Gross and S. I. Shapiro

You have to let it all go, Neo. Fear, doubt, and disbelief. Free your mind.” That’s the gist of this book on photography. But why did I start with a quote? Because when a book is written by PhDs that’s the frakking problem… QUOTES. CITATIONS. FREE RANGE PEDANTICISM. As great as the book was, I always have trouble reading books on creativity when written by PhDs because the paragraphs are flooded with a tsunami of quotes which leaves me wondering if these PhDs have ever had an original thought. But the book’s message in this mess of quotes is about letting go of the discriminating mind. It helps a lot if you have already familiarized yourself with Taoism to begin with. There’s nothing here about the technical aspect of photography, this is purely about creativity, about detachment, about seeing the wonder in the mundane. Despite the excess of quotes, still a great book.

4-out-of-5-stars.gif

 

Update IV : Published March 22th, 2007

life_after_death_dc.jpgLife After Death: the Burden of Proof
by Deepak Chopra

ACK! BLEH! I need some more Richard Dawkins to serve as Mental Mouthwash to remove the bitter aftertaste Deepak’s latest book has left. In an interview he gave on the CBC, Deepak made an impressive case for the USER to Dawkin’s Hardware argument. SO I had to read. But it’s just a lot of fluffy reprocessed predigested new-agy bullshit where everyone gets what they expect. It’s exactly what’s wrong with the New Age movement. It’s all about horizontal growth and not vertical.

1-out-of-5-stars.gif

 

Update III : Published March 8th, 2007

photography_freeman.jpgPhotography: The New Complete Guide to Taking Photographs
by John Freeman

A beginner’s guide to photography which falls short on many, many aspects the would-be beginner should be looking for. First, the book goes old-school. Virtually no camera shop sells film based cameras anymore and there’s a good reason for that: The demand isn’t there. New photographers as well as old ones and mostly leaving film behind and have gone digital. The book, published only 3 years ago, concentrates on film based SLR cameras and perhaps makes mention of DSLR 5 or 6 times, a grave mistake in my opinion. Second, too much room has been made to showcase the often stock photography work of John Freeman in lieu of technical details. For instance, when describing lighting details, show me a graphic detail of the setup to help me better understand, this is what matters to me, not the 6 different results of the picture. When describing pieces of equipment, show it to me please, so I can recognise it when I’m looking for it; it was the reason I purchased the book, to learn more about the technical aspect of photography.

3-out-of-5-stars.gif

 

 

Update II : Published March 7th, 2007

god_delusion.jpgThe God Delusion
by Richard Dawkins

A no holds barred manifesto decrying the insanity of religion and its power over people by the uber-genius who is known as Darwin’s pit-bull. His opponents have called Dawkins hostile, but on the contrary, he’s much gentler than one could ever believe. His hostility stems from his incredulity when faced with the amount of illogical bullshit people will believe and the dark ends they will go to, to defend that bullshit.

“I am thrilled to be alive at a time when humanity is pushing against the limits of understanding. Even better, we may eventually discover that there are no limits.”

5-out-of-5-stars.gif

Update I : Published January 22nd, 2007

warphoto.jpgWar Photography: Images of Conflict from Frontline Photographers
by Giles H. Wynn (Editor)

A promising title for a person who aspired to become a war photographer. Unfortunately this book is a collection of archive war pictures from the Daily Mirror, a British paper and has very little pictures that depict the horrors of war. Most of the images are portraits or images that are easily manufactured. There is no Capa-esque fortitude to be found here. Frank Capa’s mantra was simple: “If your pictures aren’t good enough, you’re not close enough.” And the book just never comes close.

2-out-of-5-stars.gif

 

Original Post : Published January 16th, 2007

Science Friction : Where the Known Meets the Unknown
by Michael Shermer

If you don’t know who Shermer is, he’s the founder of Skeptic Magazine. So it’s a lot less about science and a lot more about debunking and pride and self-promotion. But it was still a very interesting read for the science geek in me. He may be the good buddy of Mr Richard Dawkins but their writing styles are galaxies apart.

3-out-of-5-stars.gif

Stiff: The Curious lives of Human Cadavers
by Mary Roach

I began by reading her second book, Spook: Science Tackles the Afterlife and I was hooked. Hooked on her books, hooked on her witty smart and hilarious writing style. I wish to mind-meld with Mary Roach. I devour her books and I can’t wait for her next one. She could write about the fascinating world of filling out tax forms and I’d still read it with immense interest.

5-out-of-5-stars.gif

  1. August 17, 2007 at 23:50 | #1

    Terrific roster of books, challenging and mind-expanding. Nice to find people who aren’t reading big, fat dopey fantasy novels or contrived memoirs. The Hitchens book is one that’s on my list–he’s such a smart, erudite man, similar in many ways to his friend, Martin Amis.

  2. August 17, 2007 at 23:56 | #2

    Heh, I don’t do fiction…. It just doesn’t float my boat. Once in a while I’ll read fiction, but even as a Sci-Fi geek I keep away from genre books. And no memoirs; I did this, I’m so great, bla bla bla…. no thanks.

  3. August 18, 2007 at 00:09 | #3

    Ah, but there’s some good SF out there. Just finished Peter Watts’ BLINDSIGHT, which was fun. Check out stuff by Charles Stross, Tony Daniel and Dennis Danvers too. The “post-humanist” slant sci fi currently has currently taken on is interesting…but scary as hell.

    I read a lot of non-fic too. Just about finished with Margaret McMillan’s book on Mao and Nixon’s famous meeting in 1972. Not nearly as good as her book on the Versailles negotiations after World War I…

  4. August 18, 2007 at 00:24 | #4

    I’m sure there’s some great SF and fantasy out there. Being of a visual nature, I prefer to SEE my Sci-Fi despite all the claims the the written Sci-Fi is superior. When I read it, I snooze off. I can’t help it. It just doesn’t catch me. I like to read about science, sociology, philosophy and the like, the kind of stuff not available in other medias. When it comes to Sci-Fi, I want to sit back and be immersed through camera angles, score, lighting, etc.

  5. August 18, 2007 at 15:44 | #5

    There must be better sci fi on television because I can’t remember the last sci fi motion picture that turned my crank. On the other hand, when you read Iain Banks’ CONSIDER PHLEBAS or EXCESSION, you are plunged into a galaxy-spanning vision, space opera at its very best (with a depth and breadth that leaves George Lucas and his ilk in the dust). Mile long spaceships captained by artificial intelligences with more personality than most humans, first contact with utterly alien (and believable) species…

    But we only get two channels in our book-friendly abode so, as I say, perhaps the small screen is blessed with some good sci fi programs right now. I do love the genre–I wrote a piece on the appeal of old SF movies called “In Praise of Men in Rubber Suits”. You should have a peek at it. It might bring on a wave of nostalgia, a warm recollection or two…

  6. September 22, 2007 at 18:34 | #6

    I find it hard to pick up any book these days if it isn’t going to help me understand the world around me. The God Delusion was the last book I read and before that was some Quantum Physics books. Excellent selections.

  7. September 22, 2007 at 18:37 | #7

    Thanks. Its pretty much all I read. For entertainment…. TV :D

  8. November 19, 2007 at 12:27 | #8

    Thanks for the recomandations Dave! There are a few that interest me, such as Tao Of Photography. :-)

  9. November 19, 2007 at 13:11 | #9

    Great book and read.

  10. November 19, 2007 at 23:37 | #10

    That’s a hell of a read list! There’s a few titles on there I think I’ll check out.

  11. November 20, 2007 at 00:01 | #11

    Heh Thanks. 2007’s not over yet :D

  1. September 26, 2007 at 14:41 | #1
  2. January 7, 2008 at 20:34 | #2
  3. February 10, 2009 at 14:05 | #3